Contents Start reading
FORECASTER · RESEARCH DRAFT
I NEVER SAID THAT
Who Owns Your Reputation When the Internet Can Invent You?
The complete research draft is available here to read online. It remains open to revision; commissioning supports the finished, edited PDF edition.
Updated October 5, 2026. The finished, edited PDF edition is offered separately on the book details page.
Contents
- 01
A Sentence Beside Your Name
A false attribution changes a person's working day before anyone has established where it came from.
- 02
Ten Reports, Two Sources
A small source map shows why repeated reports cannot simply be counted as independent confirmation.
- 03
The File and the Event
File history, identity, context and truth are separate questions that require different evidence.
- 04
The Sentence That Stays
Repetition, source memory and correction are different problems, and imperfect recall need not decide how we treat a person.
- 05
Make a Record You Can Use
A bounded record can help correct a false claim while protecting the people whose lives appear beside it.
- 06
Send the Correction Back
Correction delivery must be measured against the audience of the original claim, with attention and changed decisions tracked separately.
- 07
When a Machine Repeats It
A generated answer and its cited page must be checked separately before either becomes a judgment about a person.
- 08
Before You Decide About a Person
Fair decisions require clear claims, proportionate action, protection for complainants, and a genuine route to revise what was decided.
- 09
Who Owes the Repair
Repair duties should follow each actor's contribution and power, with corrections reaching the people and decisions the original claim affected.
- 10
After the Last Search
Tess sets a boundary around the remaining work, and the people who carried the error take responsibility for keeping its correction available.
Method appendix: an invented report network
Assumptions, reproducibility and limits of the invented report network and audiences.